Re: Confusion over device major:minor numbering...
[Posted and mailed]
In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.980128125434.14499Aemail@example.com>,
firstname.lastname@example.org (Dale Scheetz) writes:
> I have been looking at the devices in /dev with the hope of understanding
> what drivers I have on my machine. I have been under the (mistaken?)
> understanding that major:minor numbers were supposed to be unique for each
> device, yet this doesn't seem to be the case. For instance:
> 1:1 belongs to both /dev/mem and /dev/ram1
> 1:2 belongs to both /dev/kmem and /dev/ram2
> 1:7 belongs to both /dev/full and dev/ram7
/dev/mem is a character device and /dev/ram1 is a block device:
0 crw-rw---- 1 root kmem 1, 1 Jan 9 1997 /dev/mem
0 brw-r----- 1 root disk 1, 1 Dec 31 1969 /dev/ram1
Same thing for the others.
> A different type of the same class of confusion stems from:
> 8:16 is used by both /dev/sda16 and /dev/sdb
I have no /dev/sda16 or anyother /dev/sd?16
Graduate Student email@example.com
Department of Chemistry firstname.lastname@example.org
Univ of Wisconsin-Madison email@example.com
<PGP Public Key: finger firstname.lastname@example.org>
I try to impress someone and always end on the short end.
-- tagline 1.00 by xopy
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .