Re: How do we interpret the Stalin license?
Rob Browning writes:
> I'm particularly concerned about the "current release" bit, and the
> insistence on the email. While we certainly will report all the bugs
> upstream, I'm not sure what to make of (3).
>> The current release of Stalin is provided for free...
An author can always make the next release non-free if he wishes, no matter
what the license on the current release says. The phrasing is ominous,
>> 1. You report *ALL* bugs to Bug-Stalin@AI.MIT.EDU whether or not you
>> need them fixed. Include the version number (0.7) in the message.
What is a "bug" and who does he mean by "you"? He can't enforce any
conditions on the end user and neither can we, so how are we to know about
"*ALL* bugs"? I think we could deal with this one by simply forwarding all
bug reports to him. The only bugs we have to report are ones we find.
>> 2. You report *ALL* bugs that you fixed to Bug-Stalin@AI.MIT.EDU.
>> Include the version number (0.7) in the message.
Same as 1. Send him a patch if you fix anything.
>> 3. You inform me that you obtained a copy of Stalin by sending a message
>> to Info-Stalin-Request@AI.MIT.EDU to be put on the
>> Info-Stalin@AI.MIT.EDU mailing list.
So the maintainer subscribes to his mailing list. He is demanding that the
*recipient* of each copy inform him, not that the distributor do so.
Another junk license. You'd think that someone capable of coding such a
large, complex program could manage to read a copyright FAQ.
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
firstname.lastname@example.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .