Re: Emacs20 and mail file locking.
- To: "Debian Developers' Forum" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Emacs20 and mail file locking.
- From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Date: 07 Jan 1998 12:53:26 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87d8i41889.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>
- In-reply-to: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com's message of "27 Dec 1997 23:42:48 -0800"
- References: <E0xj9Jf-0000CJ-00@eos.lugs.ch> <87d8iniz7x.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu> <87yb198yde.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <87sorh8xum.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <87zplohb1o.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu> <873ejdoqvb.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> >>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:
>
> Rob> Assuming you're right, and movemail is used for all mail
> Rob> locking, then if we patch movemail to use liblockfile, we
> Rob> should be fine.
>
> I volunteer to try rolling those patches into XEmacs 20.5. I think
> that configure ought to detect `liblockfile' and compile `movemail'
> accordingly. Sound right?
Maybe you already knew this, but I just got around to looking at the
movemail source for emacs 20, and it really looks like movemail
already knows how to handle liblockfile. Check out MAIL_USE_MAILLOCK
and HAVE_TOUCHLOCK.
If someone who knows liblockfile better than I do gets motivated
before I do, please check movemail to make sure it really is doing the
right thing when those vars are defined, and let me know.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: