Re: Bash 2.0 Problems
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Brian C. White wrote:
> > > bash2.0 is fine for me. Been using it for a while, and everything
> > >works fine... except sysklogd which has already been fixed, what bash2.0
> > >is known to break?
> >
> > Has the update-rc.d script been fixed yet?
>
> Okay, it sounds like the problems associated with bash2 are few. Let's
> go with it.
>
> Could somebody verify that this script has been fixed? If it hasn't,
> please report it as a bug and let me know the bug number so I can mark
> it as critical.
The real problem is: How to be sure that the average user will upgrade
dpkg (the package containing update-rc.d) *before* any other package using
it in their postinst scripts? Currently, we can't. And I guess that this
will be a sure candidate for the Debian 1.3 FAQ.
[ BTW: That's why we need the "Breaks:" field. ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBMxsRDCqK7IlOjMLFAQHPwQP8C4eL4fPm+ARzcJK0IXKav+aAxCjLZUCr
m+gxqnfhEdU1/9pfd/ESlBiA7sNorVFZF4z1GA5rL5xGemH4G+Y2TWQ7CxdH9wFo
Iqkb4+8rnXv+iEvh3DUB65Q9k6xb4LbL+1pQpltI+sm4cUG7EqHPhM4g7S18c0gY
tPupNOiaydE=
=XhQ9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Reply to: