[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unstripped stuff in /usr/lib



bruce@va.debian.org wrote:
> 
> We could let the -dev versions of packages have diversions of the
> libraries to unstripped versions, and have the runtime versions have
> stripped versions.

Since most of the times -dev packages are needed to compile only
(headers and the symlink from lib.so), I think it'd be better to put
unstripped libraries on a separate -dbg package (as lib_d.a). Those libs
are easily 10 times the size.

Usually we have: 
runtime pkg:	shared lib stripped with --strip-unneeded
develop pkg:	static lib stripped with --strip-debug
debug pkg:	static lib unstripped

I'm not sure on what to do for shared unstripped libs (are they
supported by gdb, now?)

Fabrizio
-- 
| fpolacco@icenet.fi    fpolacco@debian.org    fpolacco@pluto.linux.it
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: