Re: unstripped stuff in /usr/lib
bruce@va.debian.org wrote:
>
> We could let the -dev versions of packages have diversions of the
> libraries to unstripped versions, and have the runtime versions have
> stripped versions.
Since most of the times -dev packages are needed to compile only
(headers and the symlink from lib.so), I think it'd be better to put
unstripped libraries on a separate -dbg package (as lib_d.a). Those libs
are easily 10 times the size.
Usually we have:
runtime pkg: shared lib stripped with --strip-unneeded
develop pkg: static lib stripped with --strip-debug
debug pkg: static lib unstripped
I'm not sure on what to do for shared unstripped libs (are they
supported by gdb, now?)
Fabrizio
--
| fpolacco@icenet.fi fpolacco@debian.org fpolacco@pluto.linux.it
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: