On Sat, Dec 06, 1997 at 03:51:26PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Good point David. That is all your point are good. But stopping libc5
> work means we have to convert all packages before the next release. IMO
> this should even hold for non-free or contrib packages. I doubt we are
> able to do that, so I prefer to have a libc5 version that is as
> compatible with libc6 as it gets.
What areas of compatibility are being worked on? I sure hope they
have to do with binary compatibility because there is no benefit to
adding source compatibility.
David Engel ODS Networks
email@example.com 1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400 Richardson, TX 75081
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .
- RE: libc5
- From: Michael Meskes <email@example.com>