Re: RFC: Deb 2.0 testing process
In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.971130131217.705A-100000@cnhobbes.ml.org> you wrote:
: This list can be added to by anyone. What I'd like to ask for now is any
: comments on this.
A checklist like this is a good idea, particularly if it eventually provides
the list of things that initially need to be part of a regression suite for
the package.
The downer is that if you don't get working on a regression suite for each
package, testing a couple thousand packages against non-null checklists seems
like it could take a wickedly long time... particularly if, as I suspect, many
packages need to get revisioned during the testing interval to fix bugs.
Bdale
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: