Re: "otherosfs" is badly named?

[Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>]

On Sun, 23 Nov 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:

> Is the section otherosfs poorly named? I assume this refers to other
> operating systems' file systems, but hamm/non-free/binary/otherosfs,
> just as an example, contains picasm and xzx, neither of which are file
> systems or anything like it.

AFAIK, otherosfs stands for `other operating systems _or_ other file
systems'.


Thanks,

Chris

--          _,,     Christian Schwarz
           / o \__   schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com,
           !   ___;   schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
           \  /        
  \\\______/  !        PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7  34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
   \          /         http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
  "DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .