Re: bashims in debian/rules
Santiago Vila Doncel <email@example.com> wrote:
> Stupid question: May a virtual package have the "essential" flag?
> If the answer is "no", and this is the *only* (technical) reason why we do
> not have a virtual package named "posix-shell" to satisfy dependencies on
> /bin/sh, then we should consider bash as non-essential.
I'm not sure a virtual package should every be able to have a
higher status than any of the real packages which fulfill it.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .