Re: debsums priority standard?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Christoph writes:
> > I got a suggestion to make the debsums package priority standard. Both
> > debmake and debhelper produce packages with md5sums. Some maintainers
> > also have manually equipped their packages with md5sums. The debsums
> > package includes scripts to check the integrity of packages installed
> > with md5sums and is quite small.
> 1. There is not yet a consensus about what the correct goals and
> mechanisms for these checksums are.
Let us discuss those goals and mechanisms in debian-policy.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
firstname.lastname@example.org . Trouble?
e-mail to email@example.com .