Re: User-contrib, up-to-date stable
Hi,
>>"David" == David Welton <davidw@cks.com> writes:
David> On 22 Oct 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
David> Maybe a libc5 computer could be made to autocompile packages?
David> Or just made available for others to work on...
Ok. I think I can agree with the need for libc5 compiled
packages. I'd be happy to compile as many of mine as I can if there
is a libc5 machine for me to upload sources (maybe a CVS server?) and
package them; I'd prefer to do it in an libc5/unstable voluntarily
contributed fashion. (It'd be unstable unless the qa group approves
of it).
As the prospect of 2.0 seems to keep slip slidin' away, I
think we may need to consider libc5 unstable upgrades. The packages
there would be available for the qa group and brian to consider
moving to bo-upgrades etc if the distribution manager deems fit.
Is there a possibility of fitting in a bo-unstable
partial distribution on the ftp site? I remember someone offerring a
libc5 machine for people to work on. Could someone refresh my memory?
manoj
--
"Every institution I've ever been associated with has tried to screw
me." Stephen Wolfram
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: