[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ELM Copyright



rdm@test.legislate.com (Raul Miller)  wrote on 10.10.97 in <19971010205510.06659@test.legislate.com>:

> Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Note the words "reasonable copying fee", and "You may not charge a fee
> > for this Package itself".  I consider this language equivalent to that
> > in the Elm license.  If you reject Elm then you must also reject the
> > Artistic License, for the same reason.
>
> Elm doesn't allow for a reasonable copying fee.  Or did I miss something?

I think so. Elm seems to allow for any copying fee you want, as long as  
it's not specifically for Elm. That's the same the Artistic License says:  
as long as it's not specifically for Perl, charge what you want. And  
that's what the DFSG wants.

At least that's how I understand it.


MfG Kai


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: