Re: About the Breaks: field.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 10 Oct 1997, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Perhaps I missed something, but what is wrong with conflicts?
Perhaps I missed something too... [ I remember having proposed this
Breaks: field in February this year and asked "Don't we need this new
field?" and the *only* answer I got was: "Yes." from Ian Jackson... So
maybe he saw at that time something I don't see now... ]
Anyway, if Conflicts: is what we need, why libc6 Conlficts line is not
*full* of conflicts. What are we waiting for?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .