Re: About the Breaks: field.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 10 Oct 1997, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Perhaps I missed something, but what is wrong with conflicts?
Perhaps I missed something too... [ I remember having proposed this
Breaks: field in February this year and asked "Don't we need this new
field?" and the *only* answer I got was: "Yes." from Ian Jackson... So
maybe he saw at that time something I don't see now... ]
Anyway, if Conflicts: is what we need, why libc6 Conlficts line is not
*full* of conflicts. What are we waiting for?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBND5O4iqK7IlOjMLFAQGppAP5AUPHjoQPQs5m3fRYmNj36k1EScGKhGN2
G+jBbnzL37RbDaqrSvcaWLQb+JcIBJar3tj5iaVC7n3ixExx5IiVeA0fyvbKw9Aq
Q7FErObuB1dEmnMTsLvixrjYFT9J4xHTQuF4JIUgljykcZQKc8woYLtQoATpM40Q
uchWCCmJV/c=
=OnxC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: