Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?

To: Scott Ellis <storm@gate.net>
Cc: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>, Carey Evans <c.evans@clear.net.nz>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:13:58 -0401
Message-id: <[🔎] 19971009141358.52862@test.legislate.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.A32.3.93.971009131733.48962B-100000@dakota.gate.net>; from Scott Ellis on Thu, Oct 09, 1997 at 01:18:26PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 87yb42u9xr.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu> <[🔎] Pine.A32.3.93.971009131733.48962B-100000@dakota.gate.net>

Scott Ellis <storm@gate.net> wrote:
> Still the extra spawn overhead.  Letting sendmail know about it is a
> better option less likely to break anything.

Argh... what is this "spawn"?  How can it have overhead?  I see
no such thing in my libc.  [Bad enough when you were saying 1>1.]

-- 
Raul


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?
  - From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?
  - From: Scott Ellis <storm@gate.net>

Prev by Date: about `policy weekly' postings
Next by Date: Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?
Previous by thread: Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?
Next by thread: Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread