Re: Bug#13723: libc5-altdev should include instructions for its use
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Brian White wrote:
> > > As a side note, why is it's directory "i486-linuxlibc1" instead of "libc5"?
> > Because that's the configuration gcc and binutils use to refer to
> > libc5. Blame RMS, he still believes Linux libc5 == GNU libc1.
well, strictly speaking, it's true. Libc5 was based on
GNU libc1 and, i believe, is under definition of
> Ah. Too bad it wasn't easy to change. Thanks for the explanation.
why do you need to change it?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .