[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Huh? Help (Re: Bug#13626: xmorph: YAFHardCodedi386)

Just got the following bug report.

Is it not customary to put binaries compiled for Intel under "i386"?  I am
confused.  But I am also new here.

On 5 Oct 1997, James Troup wrote:

> Package: xmorph
> Version: 11sep97
> The debian/control file of this package lists the architecture as
> `i386'.  Unless it really does only work on i386 (I can't, for
> example, see any hardcoded i386 assembler, or any other i386-dependent
> things), it should be `any'.
> -- 
> James

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: