Re: [DEBIAN] Why do we need a base *section*?
On Sat, Oct 04, 1997 at 11:17:04PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> According to =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?=:
> > On Sat, 4 Oct 1997, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > > > Ok.. that would be better. But, why do you need those symlinks anyway? =
> > =3D3D=3D
> > > ("First, we kill all the MIMEs.")
> > Get a better mailer.
> If *you* followed your own advice, you wouldn't bombard those of us
> who still believe in plain text with extraneous markup line noise.
I used to despise MIME too; that was when I was using elm
(authentic, not ME+) with metamail; that was dreadful.
Now I use mutt and mime is very well handled.
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [***** ] 54%
Your train has been cancelled due to defective government at Spring Street..
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .