[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: are lsm files worth putting in binary package?

Jim Pick wrote:
> I don't think they need to be included.  

I'm just wondering if it would be overdoing things for me to file bugs on
the 38 packages that currently contain lsm files.
> Eventually, I wouldn't mind putting together a lsm package that
> contained the raw data - and maybe another package that contained some
> tools for manipulating it + link it into dwww (the next version).  So 
> there isn't a lot of reason to have the LSM files in each package.

I think that'd be a useful thing to have.

see shy jo

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: