Re: Uploaded sendmail 8.8.7-3 (source i386) to master
'johnie@netgod.net wrote:'
>
>Format: 1.5
>Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 14:02:01 -0400
>Source: sendmail
>Binary: sendmail
>Architecture: source i386
>Version: 8.8.7-3
>Distribution: unstable
>Urgency: low
>Maintainer: Johnie Ingram <johnie@debian.org>
>Description:
> sendmail - A powerful mail transport agent.
>Changes:
> sendmail (8.8.7-3) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * No longer depends on deliver (#11655).
> * Updated to Standards-Version 2.3.0.0.
> * Corrected typo in debian/rules which prevented tcpwrapper support from
> working.
Has anyone else played with the tcpwrapper support? I have and I
decided I didn't like it: the access control it provides is too
granular and the price is more DNS and identd network traffic. I
don't think it is worth it. Should this be disabled?
--
Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com | Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: