Re: RPM (Was Re: Deity project schedule problems)
On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 10:36:00 PDT Bruce Perens (bruce@debian.org)
wrote:
> From: Lalo Martins <lalo@javali.com.br>
> > Not serious? I almost unsubscribed and started uninstalling
> > Debian machines when I read that. DPKG and .deb are about
> > 150% superior sollutions, and you can't improve RPM because
> > RedHat makes very sure it's proprietary.
>
> As long as the majority of people still think dpkg/dselect are 150%
> superior, we'll stick with them. Is that how everyone feels?
Yes. For nth time.
> However, I reject your point that it's proprietary - RPM is GPL-ed.
> It's also a finished program and we have the source code in hand.
> That does say something for it :-)
As you pointed out in the deity controversy, we don't have control over it (it seems to be a problem to you that we lack control over deity, which I tend to agree with). And if it's to fork our own version of rpm, I don't see the advantage.
Phil.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: