Re: debstd-like tool for those who don't want to use debmake
On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Mark Baker wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>
> > (If you think I missed automake purposes totally--which is likely to be
> > the case--please show me how a new debian/rules file would look like.)
>
> You did.
>
> The debian/rules file would like just like it was written manually, with
> no references to debstd or anything.
>
> It would be generated by automake based on a debian/rules.ar file which
> had lots of macros, and was probably fairly similar to what the rules file
> in Joey's idea would look like.
Ok, this sounds intresting.
Anyways, I think that both approaches (debhelper and automake) have their
advantages. Since they don't seem to conflict, every developer can use
the solution of his/her choice.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com,
Debian GNU/Linux? schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
http://www.debian.org http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: