Re: FTP site orginazation (draft 2)
> > After some discussion, the proposal is now:
> >
> > documents/ (auxillary documentation files [1])
>
> > [1] This was proposed as an additional side-distribution where
> > documentation can be placed that is not directly attached to
> > programs within the main distribution. Thus things like
> > "emacs-doc" would stay in "main" since it's directly attached
> > to emacs, ...
>
> Well I don't know about emacs-doc (I'm vi_holic :-),
I'm so sorry to hear that! There are self-help groups for that you know?
<laugh>
> but I would say
> "user docs" and manpages to stay inside the binary package, while huge
> bunch of other docs (development docs, e.g., but also Usenet-FAQs, HOWTO
> in several format/language) as well as journals, bible (no binary: it
> should split in two packages) and Shakespeare Opera Omnia stay
> separated.
In most cases, the docs do stay within the binary package. Emacs is
one of the few that doesn't because of some of the sizes. Check out
the eslip references manual for one.
Brian
( bcwhite@verisim.com )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generated by Signify v1.02. For this and more, visit http://www.verisim.com/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . Trouble?
e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: