Re: Once again: libc6 packages compatibility etc...
Brian White wrote:
> Thinking about this a bit more...
>
> To be consistant, the proper name (using the idea above) for "xlib6" would
> then be just "x6" (and "libc6" would be just "c6") since the idea was
> to remove "lib" from the name as it is redundant.
When we carry it this far, "lib" no longer seems redundant. x6 and c6 are
very confusing package names.
--
see shy jo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: