Re: xpm4 and versioned dependencies, proposed solution

To: Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@noah.dfis.ull.es>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xpm4 and versioned dependencies, proposed solution
From: Joey Hess <joey@kite.ml.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 13:10:51 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19970918131051.16725@kite>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970918153455.32554C-100000@noah.dfis.ull.es>; from Enrique Zanardi on Thu, Sep 18, 1997 at 03:49:34PM +0100
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970918153455.32554C-100000@noah.dfis.ull.es>

Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> As many others may have downloaded these packages from Incoming, I
> would like to know if there are any suggestions or objections to that
> solution, before doing it.

Those of us who have downloaded the package from incoming can be expected to 
go through some contortions to install the propsed version -- after all, we 
had to do some unusual things to install the current version. ;-)

-- 
see shy jo

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- xpm4 and versioned dependencies, proposed solution
  - From: Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@noah.dfis.ull.es>

Prev by Date: Re: database of maintainers
Next by Date: Re: Where is `gettextize'?
Previous by thread: xpm4 and versioned dependencies, proposed solution
Next by thread: Re: xpm4 and versioned dependencies, proposed solution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread