Re: New ftp section for libc[45] - what to call it?
Vincent Renardias wrote:
>
> > > So does anybody have a clever idea as to what to call it -
> > > libc4and5, oldlibc, glibc1, libc5, oldlibs?
> >
> > IMHO, oldlibs sounds best.
>
> I'd rather call it 'obsolete'. So if one day we need to keep
> somewhere old packages not necessarilly containing libraries,
> we'll be able to put them there too.
I agree. Something like "obsolete" is the way to go. But
"obsolete" sounds like these are obsolete packages... it's
best to make clear that they are _normal_ packages that just
deal with obsolete {libraries|formats|whatever}.
Something akin to "legacy".
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
I walk the maze of moments...
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:lalo@javali.com.br
pgp key in the web page
on IRC: akaa
Free Software Union -- http://www.fslu.org
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
***** for Portuguese speakers only: *****
NCO (quadrinhos) -- http://www.connect.com.br/nco
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: