[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: trouble making a package

On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> > > 
> > > 	1) The newest version of Clisp is labelled 1997-08-07.  It doesn't
> > 
> > No. I would call the package "clisp" and set the version number to
> > "1997.08.07-1". Please don't use dashes (-) in the upstream version number
> Ok.  I've got the source unzipped in /usr/local/debian/clisp_1997.08.07-1
> (for clisp_1997.08.07 package,  1st revision).  If I cd into that
> directory and run deb-make,  tho,  I get
> Illegal package name clisp_1997.08.07. Must be lowercase letters and
> digits, . and : .

The directory name may not contain the Debian revision ("-1"). It should
work if you use "clisp-1997.08.07" for the directory (note that dash "-").
That's because the directory name should not have to be changed if you
make a new Debian version.

> 	Clues?  Also,  as I understand it,  the idea is to *not* change in
> any way the Makefiles,  except to modify the clisp_whatever/debian/rules
> makefile,  right?

No, the idea is to change only very few files. But often it's necessary to
change Makefiles, etc. Of course, if there is a "Makefile.in" from a GNU
configure-based source, you should never modify "Makefile" but
"Makefile.in", since the first will be overwritten with the next
call to "configure".



--                  Christian Schwarz
                   schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com
                  schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
                PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7  34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
 CS Software goes online! Visit our new home page at

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: