Re: trouble making a package
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> I'm packaging clisp for "hamm". ... I had a package set up and uploaded,
> and it's recently come to my attention that I've probably made a few
> mistakes, so I was just going to repackage it and upload the new files
> maybe tomorrow. Here's my questions:
>
> 1) The newest version of Clisp is labelled 1997-08-07. It doesn't
> have major/minor revision numbers. I know that there has been at least
> one major release before this; should I just (for the purposes of dpkg,
> etc.) declare that this is version 2.0 and number future releases this
> way?
No, if the upstream version is dated, the debian version should carry the
same date so people familiar with the upstream version will know what it
is. Try clisp_1997.08.07-1 or similar.
- --
Scott K. Ellis | The reason angels can fly is that
storm@gate.net | they take themselves so lightly.
| -- G.K. Chesterson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNBgCyKCk2fENdzpVAQEevQP+JORiczNL75HT5PdeMW0ekfv1+23zLKe+
8a00CirJUfXzVGt+Xp11nrv1KhTq/8GXtC7oV74fctAyLb5Jsh7ItzoN8ecJMSvP
gPC7XFak07N8a+x4H+G6zO4dCj4fDo48A8zYCMkqC2uJBXo42Y7ejN73iBat3OBL
cAazB/e+W6Q=
=aK62
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: