Re: /bin/sh - /bin/bash

To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>
Cc: Santiago Vila Doncel <sanvila@unex.es>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /bin/sh - /bin/bash
From: Vincent Renardias <vincent@waw.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 20:39:44 +0100 (GMT+0100)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95.970909203823.15974C-100000@odin.waw.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970909112924.31742A-100000@miriam.fuller.edu>

On Tue, 9 Sep 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> bash is in the base system and therefore universally available. What is
> the problem with /bin/bash?

On slow systems (386, etc...) ash is *much* faster than bash and takes
much less memory.

bash is fine overwise...

--
-     ** Linux **         +-------------------+             ** WAW **     -
-  vincent@debian.org     | RENARDIAS Vincent |          vincent@waw.com  -
-  Debian/GNU Linux       +-------------------+      http://www.waw.com/  -
-  http://www.debian.org/           |            WAW  (33) 4 91 81 21 45  -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /bin/sh - /bin/bash
  - From: Richard Kilgore <rkilgore@ece.utexas.edu>

References:
- Re: /bin/sh - /bin/bash
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Intention to re-write /usr/sbin/install-info
Next by Date: Re: xlib6g and emacs (and others)
Previous by thread: Re: /bin/sh - /bin/bash
Next by thread: Re: /bin/sh - /bin/bash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread