Re: bzip2 -- no longer non-us?
>>>>> "Mike" == Michael Neuffer <firstname.lastname@example.org.Uni-Mainz.de> writes:
Mike> We have enough partial mirrors that can not the whole disribution due to
Mike> disk space constraints. More packages would fit on distribution CDs
Mike> and people that transport the distribution home via sneakernet and
Mike> install/upgrade directly from harddisk, don't have to devote that much
Mike> diskspace anymore. Those people that update via a modem link would also
Mike> appreciate the decreased download times.
As for the CDs, one significative benefit would be to have one single
CD for sources+binaries, but i doubt it would fit, even with 'bzip2 -9'.
Even if it did, not a lot of space would be free for future growth.
So with the hypothesis of 2 CD, there is nothing to gain as they are
not very full : 380Mb instead of 650Mb for Debian 1.3.1.
But all other arguments are valid, so only CD users would see an
objection to the use of bzip2.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .