Re: About bo-updates
In article <[🔎] 87en7mp46k.fsf@slip-86-1.ots.utexas.edu> you wrote:
: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com> writes:
: > We did? What was this decision?
: Just to continue with the original plan, but to name new versions
: 1.3.1 revision x. That will hopefully make it obvious that 1.3.1 CDs
: are still current. I will also modify the READMEs in bo & bo-updates
: to stress that.
Are we now getting into the business of confusing our customers
like the commercial ad campaigns?
The release is 1.3 and 1.3.1 is the first patch level. Why do we need
to pretent that 1.3.1 is current when it is not?
--
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
Please always CC me when replying to posts on mailing lists.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: