Re: Bug#3253: Pine base64 bug
Hi,
I have a question, then, about the way the bug tracking system
is used. If people are supposed to let feature requests linger in the
system, then the NAG system and any attempt to ensure all bugs over X
days be closed is in error. Also, the intent of the weekly bug
summaries also seems wrong.
Personally, I would like to off load the feature request in a
manner similar to forwarded upstream handling. No nag requests,
nothing showing in the weekly summaries. It'll still be tracked (not
being in a closed state) by the bug system, and show up on the web
pages.
How much work would it be to implement such a enhancement? we
should be able to steal code from the `forwarded' section, and would
need to update the instructions pages.
manoj
--
"In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been
granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.
I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it." John
F. Kennedy (from his Inaugural Address)
Manoj Srivastava <url:mailto:srivasta@acm.org>
Mobile, Alabama USA <url:http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: