Re: Just a few questions...
On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>> What about the required package upgrades for 2.1.x?
>
>What versions of which packages are needed?
>However, I think you will have to live with the "unstable" tree of debian.
>And yes, this are the "Debian devel-2.0" packages.
>
>Really, I'm no kernel wizard, but I *know* that I read messages on this list
>about kernel 2.1.x compiling. (Or on debian-user)
>
>If you can tell me what versions are needed, I will take a look at my
>packages file. It is up-to-date, so I can tell you what the latest version
>of xxyyzz in debian is.
>
Directly from the Documentation/Changes file:
Current Minimal Requirements
****************************
Upgrade to at *least* these software revisions before thinking you've
encountered a bug! If you're unsure what version you're currently
running, the suggested command should tell you.
- Kernel modules modutils-2.1.42 ; insmod -V
- Gnu C 2.7.2.1 ; gcc --version
- Binutils 2.8.1.0.1 ; ld -v
- Linux C Library 5.4.33 ; ls -l /lib/libc.so.*
- Dynamic Linker (ld.so) 1.9.2 ; ldd -v
- Linux C++ Library 2.7.2.1 ; ls -l /usr/lib/libg++.so.*
- Procps 1.01 ; ps --version
- Procinfo 0.11 ; procinfo -v
- Mount 2.6g ; mount --version
- Net-tools 1.41 ; hostname -V
- Loadlin 1.6a
- Sh-utils 1.16 ; expr --v
- Autofs 0.3.7 ; automount --version
- NFS 0.4.21 ; showmount --version
- Bash 1.14.7 ; bash -version
>Marcus
>
I used my old email above!
---------------------------------------
"When all of your wishes are granted,
many of your dreams will be destroyed",
Man That You Fear - Marilyn Manson
mabs@netdig.com.au
---------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: