Re: Summary? Re: source dependencies - and recomndations
- To: Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Summary? Re: source dependencies - and recomndations
- From: Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 08:32:19 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19970801083219.37689@dungeon.inka.de>
- In-reply-to: <19970731180015.20664@lalo>; from Lalo Martins on Thu, Jul 31, 1997 at 06:00:15PM -0300
- References: <19970729224747.25931@kite> <Pine.LNX.3.96.970730105741.7292A-100000@S002> <19970730022907.16396@kite> <19970730113120.19423@dungeon.inka.de> <19970730124015.20235@kite> <199707302040.WAA01146@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <19970730222902.13437@NeoSoft.COM> <19970731090311.18186@dungeon.inka.de> <19970731180015.20664@lalo>
On %M %N, Lalo Martins wrote
> On Jul 31, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote
> > > Source-Depends: x,y
> > > Source-Recommends: z
> > > Source-Suggests: t
> >
> > For autobuilding, the build script will combine all three Fields to one,
> > and threat it as a single Source-Depends. So th effect is a optical
> > effect IMO.
>
> The build script can have some flags to treat them differently. Maybe an
> --interactive flag that warns about "Suggests" and "Recommends", a
> --ignore-suggests and a --ingore-recommends.
sure. but why ? the build script should compile a debian package, and
not something that is nearly the same like a debian package.
i still don't see, why you people want these features ? and i don't know
why anyone should use them.
andreas
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: