Re: source dependencies - and recomndations
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
Joey said:
> > So you think we should have a Source-Depends-i386, Source-Depends-m68k, etc
> > fields? I guess that would work. Though perhaps there should be a
> > Source-Depends field that is used as default if Source-Depends-<arch> is not
> > present, so we won't always have to add a new field to each package when a
> > new architecture is added.
>
> let's use "Source-Depends: " and override that with
> "Source-Depends-<arch>:" ok ? the first will do for most packages, and
> with i386 specials like svgalib you have to list everything in -i386.
> Note : you have to list everything in -arch. if -arch exist, the normal
> Source-Depends is ignored.
Yes, that's exactly what I said above. (You just said it clearer. :-)
--
see shy jo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: