Re: changes to Packages file
Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> writes:
> > * provide a mechanism for finer-grain classification of the
> > package license, at least where this is practical
>
> No, I think we have to drop this. Maintainers should only classify DFSG
> vs. non-DFSG compliant--the rest should be up to the people who distribute
> the packages, i.e. CD manufacturers. (You can't say a package can be
> distributed if you don't know on what media, for example.)
I agree with Christian. See my recent emails to debian-private for
the reasons why.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: