Re: source dependencies
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Juergen Menden wrote:
> good, but that was not my question. the question was: can you
> give a general procedure to decide which packages some source
> depends on? if you try to be complete you will have to have the
> complete list to remove all "asumed-to-be-present" things.
Can you give a general procedure to decide that a program has no bugs?
We don't even have a general procedure for *binary* dependencies (yes, we
have the dpkg-shlibdep procedure, but this does not cover all
dependencies), but we have a bug tracking system so if we miss some
dependency, sooner or later we (or some user) should discover it.
I don't see great difference between source and binary dependencies.
So I don't see the need to use any other word than "Depends:".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .