RE: [Q] How do I get rid of 'no utmp entry available'
Maybe one uses the libc5 routine for utmp writing (and thus the wrapper
works) and the other one doesn't (and instead uses some own routine).
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Maor [SMTP:maor@ece.utexas.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 1997 10:09 AM
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: [Q] How do I get rid of 'no utmp entry available'
>
> miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) writes:
>
> > In article <[🔎] m0wt0ce-0000ZMC@miles.econ.queensu.ca>,
> > Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca> wrote:
> > >Sure, we know that. The question is why xterm manages to write such
> an entry,
> > >and rxvt fails. Both have identical modes:
> >
> > Because of the well-known fact that libc5 and libc6 utmp entries
> > are NOT compatible?
>
> Duh. The point is that these are both libc5 programs. The utmp
> wrapper code seems to be working for one and not the other.
>
>
> Guy
>
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe"
> to
> debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: