Re: libreadlineg2?
>
> Grepping the Package file in hamm:
>
> mitchell:binary$ grep libreadlineg2* P*
> Depends: libc6, libreadlineg2, ncurses3.4
> Depends: libc6, libreadlineg2, ncurses3.4
> Depends: libc6, libreadlineg2 (>= 2.1-2.1), ncurses3.4
> Depends: libc6, libreadlineg2 (>= 2.1-2.1), ncurses3.4, netbase
> Depends: libc6, libreadlineg2, ncurses3.4
>
> Several packages seem to depend on it, but no package provides it.
> What's up? Am I just rushing things? (I'm looking to get the hamm
> gdb running, and gdb is one of the dependers)
Now, what architecture have you?
Really, I cannot answer your question without knowing what architecture
you have, like all other problem reports. Yes, if this were a
new problem you should have filed a bug against ftp.debian.org,
but this problem is so old it's been solved already, so don't bother
fileing the bug, nor bother with the architecture field, as it's
utterly arch independant: the "bug" is that Guy was on holiday
(don't know what architecture-holiday that was). But if you take
a recent mirror of unstable, you'll be OK.
Just another reason why I don't think architecture fields in bugreports
arn't all that important. Yes, they are nice to have as a default,
and /usr/bin/bug has them. But had you filed this a a bug (say, 1.5 months
ago, you might have been the first to notice), forcing you to
mention the architecture would be silly.
--
joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: