Re: non-US reorganization (was Re: Bug#11333: dependency problem in ssh?)
On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> Do you really think this is worth the troubles? Please recall that there
> are currently 10 (ten) packages in non-us! So if you divide these 10
> packages into 3 sections... I don't think this is necessary.
I think it's useful to have all the areas organized the same. I
don't provide or maintain any of the download/install tools, but
it seems to me that their task would be simplified if they could
expect all areas on all the sites to be organized the same way.
Turning your argument around, with only 10 packages and three
sections to divide them into, is it really all that many troubles?
> However, I think we really should divide non-us into stable and unstable
> trees.
That sure makes sense to me.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: