Re: doc-base: next proposal for doc policy
- To: Debian Developers <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: doc-base: next proposal for doc policy
- From: Bill Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 06:22:51 +0800 (PST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970704061848.387G-100000@S002>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970703201748.3899D-100000@klee>
On Thu, 3 Jul 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 20:18:05 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Christian Schwarz <email@example.com>
> To: Brian White <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: Debian Developers <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: doc-base: next proposal for doc policy
> Resent-Date: 3 Jul 1997 19:25:49 -0000
> Resent-From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown:;@lists.debian.org
> On Thu, 3 Jul 1997, Brian White wrote:
> > Agreed. If you're going to do this, just create a makefile to handle
> > the different options.
> I'll try to implement it that way, the user can choose which paper format
> he/she likes.
Shouldn't it use /etc/papersize to determine the paper size?
Incidentally, the last time I checked (not recently) I noticed a
lot of programs which ignored /etc/papersize and defaulted it
internally, some to letter size and some to a4 size. I
just thought I'd mention that in hopes that any guilty
maqintainers would notice it. When I get my system somewhere
near current, I'll start reporting bugs against packages which
I notice doing this.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .