[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RfD: Debian is not randomly installing services

Christian Schwarz writes:

> > > However, we should probably distinguish between "local daemons" and
> > > "network daemons". I think it is pretty safe to start "lpd" on every
> > > machine, since the default configuration would not accept queries from
> > > foreign hosts. If I install the "lpd" package, I would not like to be
> > > asked whether this daemon should be started!
> > 
> > Really?  I haven't noticed that there is a switch at lpd similar to
> > '-r' on syslogd.  Nevertheless, even local daemon can cause security
> > problems and if the user doesn't need it why should that daemon be
> > started?
> > 
> > I could live with your addition but I would like to be prompted,
> > too.
> But I thought most people already complain, that there are too many
> questions in the installer scripts (postinst).

There might be too many questions, but I believe these new ones are

Hmm, if there are really too much questions we could implement a global
installation option 'always_start_daemon' which is defaulted to 'no'
as well as add an [O]ption section to dselect and a well-defined interface
to the options.



  / Martin Schulze  *  joey@infodrom.north.de  *  26129 Oldenburg /
 / The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media             /
/                                             -- H. Peter Anvin /

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: