Re: How about e2compr? Was: fixhrefgz debate
In article <m0whntk-0000ahC@miles.econ.queensu.ca> you wrote:
: Christoph> You want me to run around Campus installing gzip on 300 machines
: Christoph> because those users are not able to?
: Don't worry: gzip is part of the base system. <g>
Your word needs to be in Microsoft's and Apple's ear.
: Why don't we test e2compr better? Or zlib-compressed filesystem? That way we
: can have the cake (docs are compressed) and eat it too (no changes required
: to the docs).
e2compr compression is really bad. Just around 20% for most files.
I like the idea and debianized it but after I saw the compression ratios
I thought it was not yet really up for prime time.
Given the prices of harddrives my take on things is: Forget about all
compression and make that something dpkg can do on the fly if necessary and
configured by the sysadmin.
I often wish I had no gzipped files around. Would make life easier for maintainers
and also for users.
IMHO All compression should be transparently done. I wish e2compr was better.
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
Please always CC me when replying to posts on mailing lists.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .