Policy wrt Important (was Re: dc and bc in Important?)
OK, then I suspect the policy is at fault. (BTW, I checked it out and
I did find dc and bc on SunOS -- I had not known these programs were
on other OSs.)
By the current definition of Important:
* Sendmail should be there instead of smail since people expect
sendmail
* dpkg-dev should not be there since no experienced user of another
Unix would expect it
* lilo should not be there because lilo is not part of UNIX
And:
* gcc should be in Important because everybody expects a C compiler
* libc5-dev should be there because everybody expects working
header files
* make should be there, I expect a working make in any Unix
* lpr should be there, it is standard with just about any Unix
* netbase and netstd should both be there, they are standard
on Unix
* csh/tcsh should be there (again, standard on various Unices)
* The list goes on...
Basically, it seems that this policy doesn't quite apply correctly.
James Troup <J.J.Troup@comp.brad.ac.uk> writes:
> John Goerzen <jgoerzen@gesundheit.cs.twsu.edu> writes:
>
> > It seems to me that dc and bc aren't vital to the workings of a
> > system (when I deselect them, dselect doesn't warn about any
> > dependencies), yet they are in Important. Why?
>
> Because they match the first definition of Important in Policy (see
> below). When I released my first version of bc/dc I downgraded them
> to Optional by mistake and someone complained; that's obviously one
> person who agrees with me. Does anyone else think bc/dc should be
> downgraded? (If so, why?)
>
> ``Important programs, including those which one would expect to find
> on any Unix-like system. If the expectation is that an experienced
> Unix person who found it missing would go `What the F*!@<+ is going
> on, where is foo', it should be in important. This is an important
> criterion because we are trying to produce, amongst other things, a
> free Unix.'' (3.1.4.1 of debian-policy 2.1.3.3)
>
> --
> James
>
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>
--
John Goerzen | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
Custom Programming |
jgoerzen@complete.org |
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: