Moving away from MD5
I think we should start moving away from MD5 as our main hash function.
MD5 has known weaknesses so that an attacker can quite possibly create
two files, differing maybe in a single bit or in quite a few bytes, but
having the same MD5 checksum. Also, 128 bits are starting to be in the
range that can be attacked by brute force with a "birtday attack", which
requires only about 2^64 operations. Check out comp.risks, 19.14 for
one possible attack using this scheme. There may be others.
An attractive alternative would be RIPEMD-160. SHA-1, another
alternative, has the main problem that its design parameters are secret.
Source code for RIPEMD-160 is avialiable, and the algorithm is in the
public domain. For more information, you can check out
Thomas Koenig, Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de, firstname.lastname@example.org.
The joy of engineering is to find a straight line on a double
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .