Re^4: Status of Debian Policy
Am 21.06.97 schrieb edd # rosebud.sps.queensu.ca ...
DE> But they get html via the dwww package! Which gives them _more_
DE> documentation then there is in html only.
But this requires a www server! Not a good idea for slow systems like my
notebook. And the result doesn't look great.
DE> Seconded. Nobody answered my mail from yesterday which showed that the
DE> doc-linux package will take up over 5 MB (instead of 1.6 MB) for the html
You could compress the HTML pages. But this is maybe a problem for some
DE> No way. IMHO, we should add a Policy Guideline stating that html should be
DE> in a seperate package  and that info should be shipped as usual. I for
No. Then we should info and html in seperate packages. And the policy says
that HTML should be the Debian documentation format.
Uni: Budde@tu-harburg.d400.de Fido: 2:240/5202.15
Mailbox: email@example.com http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .