Re: RFC: Virtual Package Name List (was bug #10676)
Mark Eichin wrote:
>xcompat is dead (ie. it dates from when those were valid... since no
>current packages need those virtual names, xcompat isn't needed either.)
I need xcompat to run Maple VR3.
Thomas Koenig, Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de, email@example.com.
The joy of engineering is to find a straight line on a double
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .