Re: Package priorities and dependencies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > So IMHO you should have added to your initial list of packages the ones on
> > which they depend, until all dependencies are satisfied. dselect does this
> > automatically. If you don't like it, it is supposed to be done by hand.
> If this is true then there is no purpose served by priorities and they
> should be abandoned. THIS IS NOT THE CASE.
I was not objecting to the conclusion but to the reasoning. I agree that
it would be a "nice" thing to have some self-contained subsets like
required+important. Just that every installation method (horizontal
or not) should always take Dependencies into account. Of course by
changing some priorities a little bit we can achieve to satisfy some
dependencies more easily for some subsets of packages.
I think libraries should not need priorities (or they need them much less
than ordinary program packages). So if they have more or less priority, I
really don't mind. Go ahead.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .