Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?
On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Christian Hudon wrote:
> To make this clearer, the only thing that would happen it that exim would
> be marked with priority 'important' and smail with priority 'extra'..
>
> And yes, I think it'd be a good idea, assuming that exim's .forward syntax
> is backward-compatible with sendmail/smail's syntax.
Which indeed it is.
Tim.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
T J R Cutts Tel: +44 1223 333596
Dept. of Biochemistry, Tennis Court Rd., Fax: +44 1223 766002
Cambridge, CB2 1QW, UK
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: