[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?

On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Christian Hudon wrote:

> To make this clearer, the only thing that would happen it that exim would
> be marked with priority 'important' and smail with priority 'extra'..
> And yes, I think it'd be a good idea, assuming that exim's .forward syntax
> is backward-compatible with sendmail/smail's syntax.

Which indeed it is.


T J R Cutts                                           Tel: +44 1223 333596
Dept. of Biochemistry, Tennis Court Rd.,              Fax: +44 1223 766002
Cambridge, CB2 1QW, UK

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: