Re: libc6 policy in unstable
>>>>> "BW" == Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com> writes:
:: * July 15th: All libraries *must* be libc6.
:: * July 31th: All packages must be libc6.
What about:
* June 30th: Bug reports on all non-libc6 libraries.
* July 15th: All libraries libc6 compatible.
* July 31th: Bug reports on all libc5 packages, uploads of such
packages no longer allowed.
* August 31th: libc5 packages removed.
BW: Do we also want to remove all libc5 dependant packages at some
BW: point? I think this would be a good idea since otherwise
BW: things are going to get pretty messed up.
I agree. We should avoid repeating situation, when we had a.out
packages in ELF system.
Milan Zamazal
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: