Re: cygwin.dll license (was Re: FreeQt ?)
Mark Eichin wrote:
> > I just brought this up, since it was my understanding that if you
> > want to write a commercial program (ie. not under the GPL), and
> > link it against cygwin.dll, you've got to pay Cygnus $$$. Not all
> > that different than the restrictions on Qt, really.
> Two questions: (1) in what way is cygwin32.dll different from libc5.so
> in this regard (since the license for both is the same: GPL)
I believe libc5.so is LGPL...
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .